Products

EMARKETER delivers leading-edge research to clients in a variety of forms, including full-length reports and data visualizations to equip you with actionable takeaways for better business decisions.
PRO+
New data sets, deeper insights, and flexible data visualizations.
Learn More
Reports
In-depth analysis, benchmarks and shorter spotlights on digital trends.
Learn More
Forecasts
Interactive projections with 10k+ metrics on market trends, & consumer behavior.
Learn More
Charts
Proprietary data and over 3,000 third-party sources about the most important topics.
Learn More
Industry KPIs
Industry benchmarks for the most important KPIs in digital marketing, advertising, retail and ecommerce.
Learn More
Briefings
Client-only email newsletters with analysis and takeaways from the daily news.
Learn More
Analyst Access Program
Exclusive time with the thought leaders who craft our research.
Learn More

About EMARKETER

Our goal is to unlock digital opportunities for our clients with the world’s most trusted forecasts, analysis, and benchmarks. Spanning five core coverage areas and dozens of industries, our research on digital transformation is exhaustive.
Our Story
Learn more about our mission and how EMARKETER came to be.
Learn More
Methodology
Rigorous proprietary data vetting strips biases and produces superior insights.
Learn More
Our People
Take a look into our corporate culture and view our open roles.
Join the Team
Contact Us
Speak to a member of our team to learn more about EMARKETER.
Contact Us
Newsroom
See our latest press releases, news articles or download our press kit.
Learn More
Advertising & Sponsorship Opportunities
Reach an engaged audience of decision-makers.
Learn More
Events
Browse our upcoming and past events, recent podcasts, and other featured resources.
Learn More
Podcasts
Tune in to EMARKETER's daily, weekly, and monthly podcasts.
Learn More

Banks risk public ire after $742B fossil fuel investment following climate pledges

The news: The world’s biggest banks invested $742 billion in coal, oil, and gas companies last year despite extensive public climate commitments, per a report that casts doubt on the substance of their climate pledges.

The report was produced by a coalition of environmental groups, led by the Rainforest Action Network (RAN).

By the numbers: The report exposes banks’ failure to cut fossil fuel financing.

  • The banking industry has financed $4.6 trillion for fossil fuels since the 2016 Paris Agreement.
  • US-based JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi, and Bank of America were the biggest lenders to fossil fuel projects, accounting for one quarter of total fossil fuel financing in the past six years.
  • Banks did invest slightly less in fossil fuel projects last year, down 1.1% from $750 billion in 2020 and 10.6% below $830 billion in 2019.

Guilty of greenwashing? The disparity between banks’ climate pledges and the reality of their financing is obvious.

  • Some banks have set vague climate targets or ignored targets altogether. Out of the 44 banks in the report committed to net-zero financed emissions by 2050, 27 still don’t have a “meaningful no-expansion policy for any part of the fossil fuel industry.”
  • Fossil fuels are still highly lucrative for banks, which earned $16.6 billion in fees from the energy sector (including oil and gas) between 2016 and 2020, versus just $7.4 billion from green debt, per Bloomberg.

Why banks need to prioritize sustainability:

  1. Declining consumer confidence: Banks with weak sustainability efforts and empty promises risk alienating clients. More than 60% of respondents to Deloitte’s Better Banking Survey said they’d ditch their bank if they discovered it contributed to “social or environmental harm.”
  2. Demographic shift: Younger consumers have stronger environmental concerns. Research shows that 18- to 24-year-olds are almost twice as likely to switch banks based on ESG credentials than those aged 55 and older, per Kearney.
  3. Revenue opportunity: Sustainability-based banking products present vast potential extra revenue streams for industry first-movers. Banks with a “very good” ESG rating have a higher net interest income and net fee and commission income than peers with lower ratings, per BearingPoint.
  4. Harsher regulations: Tougher sustainability legislation is poised to hit the banking industry. To avoid fines and bad publicity, banks should preempt oversight by embracing sustainability practices early.

The big takeaway: Banks’ inaction in cutting fossil fuel financing is disappointing, especially considering reputational damage done by previous “greenwashing” incidents. The Ukraine war is exacerbating a looming energy crisis and worryingly high demand may support more short-term fossil fuel production. Reports like RAN’s, public opinion, and growing concerns over environmental damage will keep this issue in play and keep banks accountable for backing up PR campaigns with action.